On 05/13/2017 04:06 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> Dear Jerry,
>
>> And the actual patch ...
>
> Are you sure this the right patch? It seems mostly applied on trunk.
>
> TIA
>
> Dominique
>
> PS I saw some ‘return 1;’ which should probably ‘return true;’
>
>
When I moved the checks over
Dear Jerry,
> And the actual patch ...
Are you sure this the right patch? It seems mostly applied on trunk.
TIA
Dominique
PS I saw some ‘return 1;’ which should probably ‘return true;’
Hi Jerry,
This patch is good for both trunk and 7-branch.
Thanks!
Paul
On 11 May 2017 at 16:35, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> And the actual patch ...
>
> On 05/11/2017 08:30 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The attached patch fixes this issue by moving the DTIO namelist checks
>> from n
And the actual patch ...
On 05/11/2017 08:30 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes this issue by moving the DTIO namelist checks from
namelist resolution to READ/WRITE statement resolution. This allows the checks
to be specific to the io_kind. The dtio_procs_present funct
