On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I have applied the following, updated patch.
Thank you!
-- Gaby
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>> I think we show the stack not just for errors, but for any diagnostics.
> I agree, FWIW.
Good point, thanks for the feedback!
I have applied the following, updated patch.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
> I think we show the stack not just for errors, but for any diagnostics.
I agree, FWIW.
--
Dodji
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> I have finally applied this series of 14 patches to the mainline today.
>> The SVN revisions are from r186965 to r186978.
>
> Shouldn't we document this in the release notes?
>
> What do you guys
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> I have finally applied this series of 14 patches to the mainline today.
> The SVN revisions are from r186965 to r186978.
Shouldn't we document this in the release notes?
What do you guys think about the following? Suggestions welcome.
Gerald
Index:
On 04/30/2012 01:46 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Dodji Seketeli writes:
>
>> I am proposing a series of patches which is supposed to address the
>> remaining issues (I am aware of) preventing us from enabling the
>> -ftrack-macro-expansion by default.
>>
>> The idea is to address each issue I noti
Uros Bizjak writes:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>
pfile->context = XNEW (cpp_context);
+ memset (pfile->context, 0, sizeof (cpp_context));
>>>
>>> You can use XCNEW instead of XNEW + memset.
>>>
>>> OK with that change.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Here is th
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>>> pfile->context = XNEW (cpp_context);
>>> + memset (pfile->context, 0, sizeof (cpp_context));
>>
>> You can use XCNEW instead of XNEW + memset.
>>
>> OK with that change.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Here is the patch I will commit when Uros con
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 05/01/2012 05:36 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> pfile->context = XNEW (cpp_context);
>> + memset (pfile->context, 0, sizeof (cpp_context));
>
> You can use XCNEW instead of XNEW + memset.
>
> OK with that change.
Thank you.
Here is the patch I will commit when Uros
On 05/01/2012 05:36 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
pfile->context = XNEW (cpp_context);
+ memset (pfile->context, 0, sizeof (cpp_context));
You can use XCNEW instead of XNEW + memset.
OK with that change.
Jason
Dodji Seketeli writes:
> Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk by running the
> test gcc.dg/gomp/macro-4.c under Valgrind. Bootstrap is still
> underway.
For what it's worth, the patch passes bootstrap on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> libcpp/
>
> * directives.c (destringize_and_
Uros Bizjak writes:
> Your patch introduced:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/macro-4.c (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/macro-4.c (test for excess errors)
>
> on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu. The failure is silent on
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, but can be uncovered by valgrind:
>
> $ valgrind ~/gcc-build
Hello!
> > I am proposing a series of patches which is supposed to address the
> > remaining issues (I am aware of) preventing us from enabling the
> > -ftrack-macro-expansion by default.
> >
> > The idea is to address each issue I notice in the course of trying to
> > bootstrap the compiler and r
Dodji Seketeli writes:
> I am proposing a series of patches which is supposed to address the
> remaining issues (I am aware of) preventing us from enabling the
> -ftrack-macro-expansion by default.
>
> The idea is to address each issue I notice in the course of trying to
> bootstrap the compiler
Hello,
I am proposing a series of patches which is supposed to address the
remaining issues (I am aware of) preventing us from enabling the
-ftrack-macro-expansion by default.
The idea is to address each issue I notice in the course of trying to
bootstrap the compiler and running the tests with
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
