On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Joern Rennecke
joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
Quoting Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Joern Rennecke
joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
..
Well, we could split it anyway, and give ports without the need for
Quoting Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
Just to add some extra information, can you quote your ports
ADJUST_INSN_LENGTH and one example instruction with length/lock_length
attribute the above applies to?
This is a bit besides the point, since lock_length does mostly the traditional
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Joern Rennecke wrote:
I'll be posting the ARC port shortly; it does not fit into a single 100 KB
posting, so I'm thinking of splitting it in a configury patch and zx
compressed files/tarballs for arc.c, arc.md, libgcc, and the rest of the port.
The size limit is 400 kB,
Quoting Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Joern Rennecke
joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
..
Well, we could split it anyway, and give ports without the need for
multiple length attributes the benefit of the optimistic algorithm.
I have attached a
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
@@ -1165,6 +1175,7 @@ shorten_branches (rtx first ATTRIBUTE_UN
get the current insn length. If it has changed, reflect the change.
When nothing changes for a full pass, we are done. */
+ bool first_pass ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED =
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
I think instead the set-up loop should have:
if (GET_CODE (body) == ADDR_VEC || GET_CODE (body) == ADDR_DIFF_VEC)
{
#ifdef CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE
if (increasing GET_CODE (body) == ADDR_DIFF_VEC)
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
I think instead the set-up loop should have:
if (GET_CODE (body) == ADDR_VEC || GET_CODE (body) == ADDR_DIFF_VEC)
{
#ifdef CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE
if (increasing
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
When the condition is not fulfilled, we want to keep the length from the
previous iteration.
Right, that's what I mean. So we need to make sure that the difference
between the address
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
@@ -1360,12 +1369,20 @@ shorten_branches (rtx first ATTRIBUTE_UN
else
inner_length = insn_current_length (inner_insn);
- if (inner_length != insn_lengths[inner_uid])
+ /* We
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
The fact that we even have shared unique ids is pretty bad -- and surely
a contradiction in terms -- but I think both ways of handling them rely
on the length being the same for all copies. If we don't record a length
(your version), we
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
The fact that we even have shared unique ids is pretty bad -- and surely
a contradiction in terms -- but I think both ways of handling them rely
on the length being the same for all copies.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Joern Rennecke
joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
2012-10-04 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* final.c (get_attr_length_1): Use
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
2012-10-04 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* final.c (get_attr_length_1): Use direct recursion rather than
calling get_attr_length.
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
2012-10-04 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* final.c (get_attr_length_1): Use direct recursion rather than
calling get_attr_length.
(get_attr_lock_length): New function.
2012-10-04 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* final.c (get_attr_length_1): Use direct recursion rather than
calling get_attr_length.
(get_attr_lock_length): New function.
(INSN_VARIABLE_LENGTH_P): Define.
(shorten_branches): Take
15 matches
Mail list logo
