On 10/31/2012 01:12 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
OK with those changes for the rtl bits. Can't approve the generator
stuff though.
That's also OK.
Bernd
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
OK with those changes for the rtl bits. Can't approve the generator
stuff though.
It appears we are momentarily short of reviewers for the generator files.
Till someone who feels he is competent to review the generator file patches
finds
On Nov 1, 2012, Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
OK with those changes for the rtl bits. Can't approve the generator
stuff though.
Can you build machinery maintainers also review gen* and *.def patches,
of this patch (
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
OK with those changes for the rtl bits. Can't approve the generator
stuff though.
Can you build machinery maintainers also review gen* and *.def patches,
of this patch ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02897.html ).
or are
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
I can't approve the whole thing of course, but I like the idea.
However...
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
+@deftypevr {Target Hook} bool TARGET_HAVE_CC0
+@deftypevrx {Target Hook} {bool} TARGET_AUTO_INC_DEC
+@deftypevrx
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
I can't approve the whole thing of course, but I like the idea.
However...
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
+@deftypevr {Target Hook} bool TARGET_HAVE_CC0
+@deftypevrx
I can't approve the whole thing of course, but I like the idea.
However...
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
+@deftypevr {Target Hook} bool TARGET_HAVE_CC0
+@deftypevrx {Target Hook} {bool} TARGET_AUTO_INC_DEC
+@deftypevrx {Target Hook} {bool} TARGET_STACK_REGS
+@deftypevrx
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
Index: gcc/doc/tm.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/tm.texi (revision 192840)
+++ gcc/doc/tm.texi (working copy)
@@ -11333,3 +11333,11 @@ @deftypefn {Target Hook} {unsigned HOST_
Quoting Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org:
+These flags are automatically generated; you should not override
them in tm.c:
Typo: s/:$/./, also @file{tm.c}.
Thanks. I have re-bootstrapped the amended patch on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
2012-10-28 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
With the lra branch merged, I had to update the patch, because of new uses of
HAVE_ATTTR_enabled. While looking at the conflicts, I also found that it
was often hard to tell if macros were used for performance reasons, or
just because there was no other interface available. lra itself is
10 matches
Mail list logo