On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:39:34AM +0800, Terry Guo wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Hi Terry,
I still think this is stage1 material.
+ /*
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:39:34AM +0800, Terry Guo wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Hi Terry,
I still think this is stage1 material.
+ /* Don't combine if dest contains a user specified register and i3
contains
+
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Hi Terry,
I still think this is stage1 material.
+ /* Don't combine if dest contains a user specified register and i3
contains
+ ASM_OPERANDS, because the user specified register (same with dest) in
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Segher Boessenkool seg...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:54:21PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hale Wang hale.w...@arm.com writes:
Ping?
It's not a regression (or is it?), so it is
Hi Terry,
I still think this is stage1 material.
+ /* Don't combine if dest contains a user specified register and i3 contains
+ ASM_OPERANDS, because the user specified register (same with dest) in i3
+ would be replaced by the src of insn which might be different with
+ the
Segher Boessenkool seg...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:54:21PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hale Wang hale.w...@arm.com writes:
Ping?
It's not a regression (or is it?), so it is not appropriate for stage4.
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c index
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:54:21PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hale Wang hale.w...@arm.com writes:
Ping?
It's not a regression (or is it?), so it is not appropriate for stage4.
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c index 5c763b4..6901ac2 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++
On 02/12/15 15:15, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:54:21PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hale Wang hale.w...@arm.com writes:
Ping?
It's not a regression (or is it?), so it is not appropriate for stage4.
That's the big question, of course.
[ INSN can never be an asm,
-Original Message-
From: Segher Boessenkool [mailto:seg...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 6:16 AM
To: Hale Wang; 'GCC Patches'; Richard Sandiford
Subject: Re: Ping : [PATCH] [gcc, combine] PR46164: Don't combine the
insns
if a volatile register is contained.
Hale Wang hale.w...@arm.com writes:
Ping?
-Original Message-
From: Hale Wang [mailto:hale.w...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 9:58 AM
To: Hale Wang; 'Segher Boessenkool'
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [gcc, combine] PR46164: Don't combine the insns if a
volatile
Ping?
-Original Message-
From: Hale Wang [mailto:hale.w...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 9:58 AM
To: Hale Wang; 'Segher Boessenkool'
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [gcc, combine] PR46164: Don't combine the insns if a
volatile register is contained.
Hi Segher,
11 matches
Mail list logo
