On 10/08/12 17:46:03, Easwaran Raman wrote:
I have attached a revised patch. The updated ChangeLog is given below
and I have responded to your comments inline:
2012-10-08 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
* optabs.c (emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1): Add a new parameter to
specificy the
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
Index: optabs.c
===
--- optabs.c(revision 191879)
+++ optabs.c(working copy)
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode, rtx x, int
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
Index: optabs.c
===
--- optabs.c(revision 191879)
+++ optabs.c(working copy)
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode,
Hi,
Index: optabs.c
===
--- optabs.c(revision 191879)
+++ optabs.c(working copy)
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode, rtx x, int
we can do the branch. */
static void
-emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1
Ping.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
I have attached a revised patch. The updated ChangeLog is given below
and I have responded to your comments inline:
2012-10-08 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
* optabs.c (emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1): Add a new
+
+ default_edge-count = default_count;
+ if (count)
+{
+ edge e;
+ edge_iterator ei;
+ FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, stmt_bb-succs)
+e-probability = e-count * REG_BR_PROB_BASE / count;
+}
Hmm, this updates origina BB containing the
Hi,
This patch propagates the profile counts during RTL expansion. In
many cases, there is no way to determine the exact count of an edge
generated during the expansion. So this patch uses some simple
heuristics to estimate the edge counts but ensures that the counts of
the basic blocks
Hi Honza,
I am addressing some of the questions you raise here. Will send an
updated patch later.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
@@ -560,7 +577,6 @@ compute_outgoing_frequencies (basic_block b)
return;
}
}
-
if (single_succ_p (b))
What is the status of switch expansion GIMPLE rewrite? If it is not
planned for 4.8, It will be desirable to include this fix into trunk.
It also helps set up a good base line to test against regression.
thanks,
David
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
What is the status of switch expansion GIMPLE rewrite? If it is not
planned for 4.8, It will be desirable to include this fix into trunk.
I could work on it for GCC 4.8 (there's not a lot of work left to be
done for it
thanks for the update!
David
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
What is the status of switch expansion GIMPLE rewrite? If it is not
planned for 4.8, It will be desirable to
thanks for the update!
OK, I will review the patch tomorrow then. It is a good incremental step. I
would certainly like to see the gimple expansion in 4.8 however.
Honza
Hi,
This patch propagates the profile counts during RTL expansion. In
many cases, there is no way to determine the exact count of an edge
generated during the expansion. So this patch uses some simple
heuristics to estimate the edge counts but ensures that the counts of
the basic blocks
13 matches
Mail list logo
