On 02/05/18 07:11 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is the patch I eventually would like to commit.
Tested under Linux x86_64, ok for trunk ?
Ah yes, this is the one I remember thinking would be OK for stage 1.
OK for trunk, thanks.
Hi
Here is the patch I eventually would like to commit.
Tested under Linux x86_64, ok for trunk ?
François
On 17/04/2018 22:34, François Dumont wrote:
Yes, I also think there is no rush to fix this issue.
I had already written a test for a different purpose using the
On 16 April 2018 at 21:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 16 April 2018 at 20:52, François Dumont wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> While working on something else on libstdc++ I started having a test
>> failing because of the missing comma overload protection in deque.tcc. So I
>> looked for other similar
On 16 April 2018 at 20:52, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> While working on something else on libstdc++ I started having a test
> failing because of the missing comma overload protection in deque.tcc. So I
> looked for other similar places in the code and here is a patch to fix the
> places I
Hi
While working on something else on libstdc++ I started having a
test failing because of the missing comma overload protection in
deque.tcc. So I looked for other similar places in the code and here is
a patch to fix the places I found.
Let me know if it is still time to commit.
