> On May 11, 2023, at 12:08 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 10, 2023, at 9:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>>> Honza,
Main motivation for this was profiling programs that contain specific
code paths for different CPUs (such as graphics library in Firefox or
> On May 10, 2023, at 9:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
>> Honza,
>>> Main motivation for this was profiling programs that contain specific
>>> code paths for different CPUs (such as graphics library in Firefox or Linux
>>> kernel). In the situation training machine differs from the machine
>>>
> Honza,
> > Main motivation for this was profiling programs that contain specific
> > code paths for different CPUs (such as graphics library in Firefox or Linux
> > kernel). In the situation training machine differs from the machine
> > program is run later, we end up optimizing for size all
Honza,
Thanks a lot for your comments.
> On May 9, 2023, at 6:22 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
>
> From my understanding, -fprofile-partial-training is one important option
> for PGO performance.
I don't think so, speed benefit would be rather small I guess.
>>> I saw some
> > > >
> > > > From my understanding, -fprofile-partial-training is one important
> > > > option for PGO performance.
> > >
> > > I don't think so, speed benefit would be rather small I guess.
> > I saw some articles online to introduce this option for gcc10,
> >
On 5/4/23 15:37, Qing Zhao wrote:
On May 4, 2023, at 9:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/4/23 14:54, Qing Zhao wrote:
On May 4, 2023, at 4:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/3/23 21:10, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi, Jan,
You added the following patch into gcc10:
From
> On May 4, 2023, at 9:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 5/4/23 14:54, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 4, 2023, at 4:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/3/23 21:10, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi, Jan,
You added the following patch into gcc10:
From
On 5/4/23 14:54, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
>> On May 4, 2023, at 4:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 5/3/23 21:10, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Hi, Jan,
>>>
>>> You added the following patch into gcc10:
>>>
>>> From 34fbe3f0946f88828765184ed6581bda62cdf49f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>
> On May 4, 2023, at 4:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 5/3/23 21:10, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi, Jan,
>>
>> You added the following patch into gcc10:
>>
>> From 34fbe3f0946f88828765184ed6581bda62cdf49f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jan Hubicka
>> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019
On 5/3/23 21:10, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi, Jan,
>
> You added the following patch into gcc10:
>
> From 34fbe3f0946f88828765184ed6581bda62cdf49f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Hubicka
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:12:51 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] cgraphclones.c (localize_profile):
Hi, Jan,
You added the following patch into gcc10:
>From 34fbe3f0946f88828765184ed6581bda62cdf49f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Hubicka
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:12:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cgraphclones.c (localize_profile): New function.
* cgraphclones.c (localize_profile): New
11 matches
Mail list logo
