Committed revision 214211.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, VandeVondele Joost
joost.vandevond...@mat.ethz.ch wrote:
ping ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-05/msg00162.html
Ok, again. If Dominique comes up with some reason why the patch should
be modified, it can be done then. AFAICT your patch is better than the
Thanks, can somebody with svn write access commit ?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:07 PM, VandeVondele Joost
joost.vandevond...@mat.ethz.ch wrote:
Thanks, can somebody with svn write access commit ?
Please get yourself write-after-approval access per instructions at
https://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html . You can use me as your sponsor.
Thanks.
--
ping ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-05/msg00162.html
Dominque,
after Janne's OK, and FX judgement, I wonder if you have reached a conclusion.
If so, the fsf assignment is now complete, and the patch could be applied.
Joost
Ok for trunk. Thanks!
Please don't rush! The behavior of -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math
implying associative math
I have now verified that both new testcases indeed pass with
gcc version 4.6.0 20100520 (experimental) [trunk revision 159620] (GCC)
that is the revision where Tobias enabled associative math by default. So that
this patch fixes a regression.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, VandeVondele Joost
joost.vandevond...@mat.ethz.ch wrote:
I have now verified that both new testcases indeed pass with
gcc version 4.6.0 20100520 (experimental) [trunk revision 159620] (GCC)
that is the revision where Tobias enabled associative math by default.
Ok for trunk. Thanks!
Please don't rush! The behavior of -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math
implying associative math has been changed (as in reverted) between r165758
(implied associative math) and r165930 (lost associative math). AFAICT
it could be due to 165823. Investigating! I am also
Why do you want -fno-math-errno to be the default for gfortran?
because it was with rth's commit? This makes sense also because errno is a
variable that is defined for C, and not accessible from Fortran. Why would you
want -fmath-errno to be the default ?
if (flag_associative_math == -1)
Why do you want -fno-math-errno to be the default for gfortran?
AFAICT such default is not documented and the flag works
(checked on your test gfortran.dg/errnocheck_1.f90).
It should be the default, and it used to be. Fortran doesn’t care about math
routines setting errno (its existence is
Hi Joost,
Why do you want -fno-math-errno to be the default for gfortran?
AFAICT such default is not documented and the flag works
(checked on your test gfortran.dg/errnocheck_1.f90).
For -fassociative-math, the manual says
For Fortran the option is automatically enabled when both
12 matches
Mail list logo