Bin Cheng wrote:
Thanks for reviewing, I modified the ChangeLog. Is it ok for trunk and 4.7?
Yes, this is OK for trunk.
Once it has been in trunk for a week or so and nobody reported any regressions,
it would also be OK to backport to 4.7.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU
-Original Message-
From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:uweig...@de.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 6:11 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, reload] Fix bug pr52804, RELOAD pass reloads wrong
register on ARM for cortex-m0
Bin Cheng wrote:
Thanks
Ping.
Hi, could anyone help me with this bug please, if you have time?
Any comments will be appreciated.
Thanks very much.
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org]
On
Behalf Of Bin Cheng
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:51 PM
To:
Bin Cheng wrote:
In short, I think the confliction of reloads with type
RELOAD_FOR_INPADDR_ADDRESS
and type RELOAD_FOR_INPUT_ADDRESS should be handled in
reload_reg_reaches_end_p.
Also I think RELOAD_FOR_OUTPUT_ADDRESS/RELOAD_FOR_OUTADDR_ADDRESS have the
issue
symmetrically, though I have
-Original Message-
From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:uweig...@de.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 12:05 AM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, reload] Fix bug pr52804, RELOAD pass reloads wrong
register on ARM for cortex-m0
Bin Cheng wrote
