On 10/08/20 10:22 +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 06:48:36PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
I've now pushed that combined patch to master.
In libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc around line 1190, there's a
missing "#if __cpp_exceptions" test
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 06:48:36PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> I've now pushed that combined patch to master.
In libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc around line 1190, there's a
missing "#if __cpp_exceptions" test for the try/catch block that was
added by this
On 07/08/20 15:17 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On 07/08/20 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 07/08/20 14:02 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Here's the combined patch, based on your original with my proposed
simplifications applied.
I've now pushed that combined
On 07/08/20 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 07/08/20 14:02 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Here's the combined patch, based on your original with my proposed
simplifications applied.
I've now pushed that combined patch to master.
Sorry it took so long to integrate your
On 07/08/20 14:02 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Here's the combined patch, based on your original with my proposed
simplifications applied.
I've now pushed that combined patch to master.
Sorry it took so long to integrate your changes, but thanks very much
for the contribution to
Hi Jonathan,
>>Here's the combined patch, based on your original with my proposed
>>simplifications applied.
>
> I've now pushed that combined patch to master.
>
> Sorry it took so long to integrate your changes, but thanks very much
> for the contribution to GCC!
it seems this patch caused
On 30/07/20 16:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/07/20 15:29 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/05/19 21:22 +, Andrew Luo wrote:
It's been a while, but thought I'd check in again now that GCC 9 has been
branched, and master is now on GCC 10.
I've merged my changes with the latest
On 30/07/20 15:29 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/05/19 21:22 +, Andrew Luo wrote:
It's been a while, but thought I'd check in again now that GCC 9 has been
branched, and master is now on GCC 10.
I've merged my changes with the latest code and attached a diff... Let me know
if
On 12/05/19 21:22 +, Andrew Luo wrote:
It's been a while, but thought I'd check in again now that GCC 9 has been
branched, and master is now on GCC 10.
I've merged my changes with the latest code and attached a diff... Let me know
if there's any thoughts on this.
Well I failed to get
...@gcc.gnu.org On Behalf
Of Andrew Luo
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 5:15 PM
To: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: libstd...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Implement P0966 std::string::reserve should not shrink
Here's an updated diff. Still a work in progress, ran the tests
3:26 AM
To: Andrew Luo
Cc: libstd...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement P0966 std::string::reserve should not shrink
On 23/01/19 00:44 +, Andrew Luo wrote:
>Thanks for the input. I will make the suggested changes.
>
>I didn't add a changelog entry yet (which I was plann
11 matches
Mail list logo
