On 6/29/23 02:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/28/23 22:04, Li, Pan2 wrote:
It seems this patch may result in many test ICE failures on RISC-V backend.
Could you help to double confirm about it follow the possible reproduce
steps like blow? Thank you!
>> Since nobody else has provided a patch yet, is the attached OK as long
>> as x86 bootstrap and testsuite are clean?
>
> Yes.
Bootstrap and testsuite are good. Going to commit.
Thanks.
Regards
Robin
Yes. Thanks for taking care of it!
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-06-29 18:07
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; pan2.li; Richard Biener
CC: rdapp.gcc; gcc-patches; jeffreyalaw; kito.cheng
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPEs
Ah, the one sub-thread continued
Ah, the one sub-thread continued before you were CC'ed.
Sorry about that.
Regards
Robin
> Currently, I have no ideal how to walk around this ICE in RISC-V port.
> Do you have any suggestions?
I'm already bootstrapping this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/623184.html
I replied to all but it seems you got lost in the thread?
Regards
Robin
ons?
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Li, Pan2
Date: 2023-06-29 12:18
To: Jakub Jelinek; Richard Biener
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreya...@gmail.com; kito.ch...@gmail.com;
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; rdapp@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Prevent TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPEs
So
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Robin Dapp wrote:
> > I think GCN people wanted to make this code work for vectors, the
> > most obvious local fix is to use element_precision (type) above.
> >
> > Note usually vector integer divisions are not a thing so this might
> > explain why you're seeing this only
> I think GCN people wanted to make this code work for vectors, the
> most obvious local fix is to use element_precision (type) above.
>
> Note usually vector integer divisions are not a thing so this might
> explain why you're seeing this only with RVV?
Since nobody else has provided a patch
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 6/28/23 22:04, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> > It seems this patch may result in many test ICE failures on RISC-V backend.
> > Could you help to double confirm about it follow the possible reproduce
> > steps like blow? Thank you!
> I've one ICE due to this
On 6/28/23 22:04, Li, Pan2 wrote:
It seems this patch may result in many test ICE failures on RISC-V backend.
Could you help to double confirm about it follow the possible reproduce steps
like blow? Thank you!
I've one ICE due to this change as well but it wasn't in the
Sorry for disturbing, cc kito, juzhe and robin for awareness.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 12:05 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek ; Richard Biener
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreya...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Prevent TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPEs
f
Of Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 5:47 PM
To: Richard Biener
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreya...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPEs
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following makes sure
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following makes sure that using TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPE
> ICEs when tree checking is enabled. This should avoid wrong-code
> in cases like PR110182 and instead ICE.
>
> It also introduces a TYPE_PRECISION_RAW accessor
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > The following makes sure that using TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPE
> > ICEs when tree checking is enabled. This should avoid wrong-code
> > in cases like PR110182 and instead ICE.
> >
> > Bootstrap and
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following makes sure that using TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPE
> ICEs when tree checking is enabled. This should avoid wrong-code
> in cases like PR110182 and instead ICE.
>
> Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, I guess
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
