Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:33:40PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Making it guaranteed that it has at least one argument say through > template poly_int(const U &, const T &...) {} > fixes it for 4.8/4.9 as well. So, perhaps (but so far totally untested, the other bootstrap is still running):

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:23:49AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > --- a/gcc/cse.cc > > +++ b/gcc/cse.cc > > @@ -4951,8 +4951,14 @@ cse_insn (rtx_insn *insn) > > && is_a (mode, _mode) > > && (extend_op = load_extend_op (int_mode)) != UNKNOWN) > > { > > +#if

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 12:43:10PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> It seemed like there was considerable support for bumping the minimum >> to beyond 4.8. I think we should wait until a decision has been made >> before adding more 4.8 workarounds. > > I think adding a

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 12:43:10PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > It seemed like there was considerable support for bumping the minimum > to beyond 4.8. I think we should wait until a decision has been made > before adding more 4.8 workarounds. I think adding a workaround until that decision

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 7:43 AM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > "Roger Sayle" writes: > > I'd like to ping my patch for restoring bootstrap using g++ 4.8.5 > > (the system compiler on RHEL 7 and later systems). > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/632008.html > > > > Note the

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

"Roger Sayle" writes: > I'd like to ping my patch for restoring bootstrap using g++ 4.8.5 > (the system compiler on RHEL 7 and later systems). > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/632008.html > > Note the preprocessor #ifs can be removed; they are only there to document > why

RE: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

Sayle ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: 'Richard Sandiford' > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler. > > > > On 10/4/23 16:19, Roger Sayle wrote: > > > > The recent patch to remove poly_int_pod triggers a bug in g++ 4.8.5's > > C+

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

> On 8 Oct 2023, at 05:40, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/7/23 15:30, Sam James wrote: >> Jeff Law writes: >>> On 10/4/23 16:19, Roger Sayle wrote: The recent patch to remove poly_int_pod triggers a bug in g++ 4.8.5's C++ 11 support which mistakenly believes poly_uint16 has a

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On 10/7/23 15:30, Sam James wrote: Jeff Law writes: On 10/4/23 16:19, Roger Sayle wrote: The recent patch to remove poly_int_pod triggers a bug in g++ 4.8.5's C++ 11 support which mistakenly believes poly_uint16 has a non-trivial constructor. This in turn prohibits it from being used as

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

Jeff Law writes: > On 10/4/23 16:19, Roger Sayle wrote: >> The recent patch to remove poly_int_pod triggers a bug in g++ >> 4.8.5's >> C++ 11 support which mistakenly believes poly_uint16 has a non-trivial >> constructor. This in turn prohibits it from being used as a member in >> a union

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On 10/4/23 16:19, Roger Sayle wrote: The recent patch to remove poly_int_pod triggers a bug in g++ 4.8.5's C++ 11 support which mistakenly believes poly_uint16 has a non-trivial constructor. This in turn prohibits it from being used as a member in a union (rtxunion) that constructed

Re: [PATCH] Support g++ 4.8 as a host compiler.

On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 23:19 +0100, Roger Sayle wrote: > > The recent patch to remove poly_int_pod triggers a bug in g++ 4.8.5's > C++ 11 support which mistakenly believes poly_uint16 has a non-trivial > constructor.  This in turn prohibits it from being used as a member in > a union (rtxunion)