Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi,
>
> Sending a new version of the patch because I noticed the pattern was
> overriding the nor pattern.
>
> A second pattern is needed to capture the nor case as combine will match the
> longest sequence first. So without this pattern we end up de-optimizing nor
>
Hi,
Sending a new version of the patch because I noticed the pattern was overriding
the nor pattern.
A second pattern is needed to capture the nor case as combine will match the
longest sequence first. So without this pattern we end up de-optimizing nor
and instead emit two nots. I did not
Hi esteemed reviewer!
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 4:46 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]AArch64 sve
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi All,
>
> The following example
>
> void f10(double * restrict z, double * restrict w, double * restrict x,
>double * restrict y, int n)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> z[i] = (w[i] > 0) ? x[i] + w[i] : y[i] - w[i];
> }
> }
>
> generates
