Re: [PATCH GCC]Relax the probability condition in CE pass when optimizing for code size

2013-04-08 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/06/2013 09:15 PM, Bin Cheng wrote: -Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Bin Cheng Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:33 PM To: 'Joern Rennecke' Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; 'Jeff Law' Subject: RE: [PATCH

RE: [PATCH GCC]Relax the probability condition in CE pass when optimizing for code size

2013-04-06 Thread Bin Cheng
-Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Bin Cheng Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:33 PM To: 'Joern Rennecke' Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; 'Jeff Law' Subject: RE: [PATCH GCC]Relax the probability condition in CE

RE: [PATCH GCC]Relax the probability condition in CE pass when optimizing for code size

2013-03-26 Thread Bin Cheng
-Original Message- From: Joern Rennecke [mailto:joern.renne...@embecosm.com] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:53 PM To: Bin Cheng Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Relax the probability condition in CE pass when optimizing for code size Quoting Bin Cheng

Re: [PATCH GCC]Relax the probability condition in CE pass when optimizing for code size

2013-03-25 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com: During the work I observed passes before combine might interfere with CE pass, so this patch is enabled for ce2/ce3 after combination pass. It is tested on x86/thumb2 for both normal and Os. Is it ok for trunk? There are bound to be target and application