> > Since Catherine asked for further info then I will leave her to say if she
> is
> > happy to accept on this basis.
> >
>
> I withdraw my request for a testcase.
>
> Catherine
Committed as r220200.
Regards,
Robert
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 7:19 AM
> To: Richard Sandiford
> Cc: Robert Suchanek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Moore, Catherine
> Subject: RE: [PATCH RFA MIPS] Prohibit vector mod
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Matthew Fortune writes:
> >> 2015-01-23 Robert Suchanek
> >>
> >>* config/mips/mips.c (mips_hard_regno_mode_ok_p): Prohibit
> >> accumulators
> >>for all vector modes.
> >
> > This seems like a genuine bug and although it can only be triggered by
> > loongso
Matthew Fortune writes:
>> 2015-01-23 Robert Suchanek
>>
>> * config/mips/mips.c (mips_hard_regno_mode_ok_p): Prohibit
>> accumulators
>> for all vector modes.
>
> This seems like a genuine bug and although it can only be triggered by
> loongson or paired-single support it probably q
Hi Catherine,
> The patch looks reasonable, but I'd like to see a test case that fails before
> we agree to include for GCC 5.0.
It's possible to reproduce ICEs with SVN revision 212354 on mipsel-linux-gnu
target. The concerned tests are
loongson-simd.c and loongson-shift-count-truncated-1.c in
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 2:51 PM
> To: Robert Suchanek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Moore, Catherine
> Subject: RE: [PATCH RFA MIPS] Prohibit vector modes in accumulators
>
&
> 2015-01-23 Robert Suchanek
>
> * config/mips/mips.c (mips_hard_regno_mode_ok_p): Prohibit
> accumulators
> for all vector modes.
This seems like a genuine bug and although it can only be triggered by
loongson or paired-single support it probably qualifies for fixing.
My suspicion
