RE: [Patch, MIPS] Modify sysroot layout for mips-mti-* and mips-img-*

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Ellcey
As follow-up to this patch, I forgot to include a testsuite patch to two mips specific tests that fail with the new layout. These tests are loongson specific and have includes of system headers in them. The way mips.exp in testsuite/gcc.target/mips works is that for runnable tests requiring a

RE: [Patch, MIPS] Modify sysroot layout for mips-mti-* and mips-img-*

2015-06-16 Thread Matthew Fortune
Steve Ellcey steve.ell...@imgtec.com writes: As follow-up to this patch, I forgot to include a testsuite patch to two mips specific tests that fail with the new layout. These tests are loongson specific and have includes of system headers in them. The way mips.exp in

RE: [Patch, MIPS] Modify sysroot layout for mips-mti-* and mips-img-*

2015-06-15 Thread Matthew Fortune
Hi Steve, Having worked on the new layout I of course am happy with it. I think it makes the cross compiled sysroots much easier to use for installing on a target as well as making the library paths match for cross compiled and native. A couple of minor things... diff --git

RE: [Patch, MIPS] Modify sysroot layout for mips-mti-* and mips-img-*

2015-06-15 Thread Steve Ellcey
Apart from wanting to understand the need/lack of ! in various places, this is otherwise OK. Matthew Ok, I split the long lines and added the missing '!' characters to all the MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES except for the default ones. Using the '!' on the default MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES like: