Alan
> > Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797
> > Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment
> > value
> > to output_constant_pool_2
> >
> > On Fri, 15 May 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > > On 05/15/2015
Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
> to output_constant_pool_2
>
> On Fri, 15 May 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> > On 05/15/2015 04:37 AM, Dharmakan Rohit Arul Raj wrote:
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Je
On Fri, 15 May 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 04:37 AM, Dharmakan Rohit Arul Raj wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:30 AM
> > > > Just to summarize: By default in GCC v4.7.x, all the constants are pu
On 05/15/2015 04:37 AM, Dharmakan Rohit Arul Raj wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:30 AM
Just to summarize: By default in GCC v4.7.x, all the constants are put
into '.rodata.str1.4' section. In GCC v4.8.x from r192719 onward
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:30 AM
> > Just to summarize: By default in GCC v4.7.x, all the constants are put
> > into '.rodata.str1.4' section. In GCC v4.8.x from r192719 onwards, one
> > of the move instruction of the stri
On 05/05/2015 01:59 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Jeff, the issue is still reproducible with GCC v4.8 branch but
not with GCC
v4.9 or trunk. Was it fixed by some other approach or has the bug
gone latent? Obviously if the former, then the patch is only
relevant to gcc-4.8 if the latter,
com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 8:32 PM
> >> To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> >> rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
> >> Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm
Edmar-RA8797
Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
to output_constant_pool_2
On 04/29/2015 04:30 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Jeff, I have made the changes as per your comments and attached the
patch.
If the patch is OK, I will proceed with
[RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
> to output_constant_pool_2
>
> On 04/29/2015 04:30 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Jeff, I have made the changes as per your comments and attached the
> patch.
> > If the p
On 04/29/2015 04:30 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Jeff, I have made the changes as per your comments and attached the patch.
If the patch is OK, I will proceed with the regression tests.
This patch refers back to 60158 and based on what I see in 60158, it
appears I should be looking f
Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:48 PM
> >> To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> >> rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
> >> Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual
&g
Edmar-RA8797
Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
to output_constant_pool_2
On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Ping.
-Original Message-
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM
To: gcc-patches
PM
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
>> Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; Dharmakan
>> Rohit-B30502
> >Subject: RE: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment
> >value to output_constant_pool_2
-B30502
Subject: RE: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
to output_constant_pool_2
Hi,
I would like to resubmit these patches for comments. The previous detailed
discussion is available in the below mentioned link.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01679
Ping.
-Original Message-
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Subject: RE: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass
Hi,
I would like to resubmit these patches for comments. The previous detailed
discussion is available in the below mentioned link.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01679.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00489.html
The issue is still reproducible on GCC v4.8 branch
16 matches
Mail list logo
