RE: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-04 Thread Matthew Fortune
Richard Biener writes: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Doug Gilmore > wrote: > > My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting --param > > prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to be the same as > > the original

Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-04 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Doug Gilmore wrote: > My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting > --param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to > be the same as the original address. In this case, no > copying of points-to information

Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-04 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Doug Gilmore wrote: > It looks like my email being sent from my company is being dropped, re sending > via my gmail account. > > Doug > > From: Doug Gilmore > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 6:35 PM

Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-04 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 3 October 2016 at 20:36, Doug Gilmore wrote: >>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org] >>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 11:23 AM >>To: Doug Gilmore >>Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >>Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in

RE: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-03 Thread Doug Gilmore
>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org] >Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 11:23 AM >To: Doug Gilmore >Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in >duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439 > >On 3 October 2016 at

Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-03 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 3 October 2016 at 18:07, Doug Gilmore wrote: >>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org] >>Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 12:05 AM >>To: Doug Gilmore >>Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >>Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in

RE: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-03 Thread Doug Gilmore
>From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org] >Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 12:05 AM >To: Doug Gilmore >Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in >duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439 > >On 2 October 2016 at

Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-03 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 2 October 2016 at 23:05, Doug Gilmore wrote: > Hi Christophe, > >> From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org] >> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 7:57 AM >> To: Doug Gilmore >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in

RE: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-02 Thread Doug Gilmore
Hi Christophe, > From: Christophe Lyon [christophe.l...@linaro.org] > Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2016 7:57 AM > To: Doug Gilmore > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in > duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439 > >

Re: Fix PR tree-optimization/77808, ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-01 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi Doug, On 1 October 2016 at 03:35, Doug Gilmore wrote: > My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting > --param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to > be the same as the original address. In this case, no > copying of points-to