On 12/04/2018 01:59 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> OK then, here is a fourth revision of the patch.
The issue pointed out by
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg02592.html
is still present in this version.
Also, noticed a typo here:
> +/* If DMGL_NO_RECURE_LIMIT is not enabled, then
Hi Ian,
>>> Shouldn't we make it fool-proof by instead introducing a
>>> DMGL_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT
> You don't need my blessing--I wrote that code ages ago--but I agree
> with Richard that in practice it's OK to limit recursion depth by
> default. Real symbols have very limited recursion
