On 08/21/2015 08:36 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandiford writes:
Claudiu reported that I'd botched the definition of LAST_INSN_CODE
in my recent patches to reduce the size of insn_data. I'd defined
it as the last valid insn code, whereas it's supposed to be the
last valid code +1.
T
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Claudiu reported that I'd botched the definition of LAST_INSN_CODE
> in my recent patches to reduce the size of insn_data. I'd defined
> it as the last valid insn code, whereas it's supposed to be the
> last valid code +1.
>
> This patch replaces LAST_INSN_CODE with a
Claudiu reported that I'd botched the definition of LAST_INSN_CODE
in my recent patches to reduce the size of insn_data. I'd defined
it as the last valid insn code, whereas it's supposed to be the
last valid code +1.
This patch replaces LAST_INSN_CODE with a separate NUM_INSN_CODES
count, outside
