Thanks for the testing. It also passes bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK to install?
Yes, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 21:07 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Sorry for the breakage. I think we need to handle INT_LIST in the same way
as INSN_LIST though, and eliminate in XEXP (x, 1).
How about
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 21:07 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Sorry for the breakage. I think we need to handle INT_LIST in the same way
as INSN_LIST though, and eliminate in XEXP (x, 1).
How about the attached? Testing in progress...
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
REG_BR_PROB notes are stored as:
(expr_list:REG_BR_PROB (const_int prob) chain)
but a full const_int rtx seems a bit heavweight when all we want is
a plain int. This patch uses:
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB prob chain)
instead.
I think
Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de writes:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
REG_BR_PROB notes are stored as:
(expr_list:REG_BR_PROB (const_int prob) chain)
but a full const_int rtx seems a bit heavweight when all we want is
a plain int. This patch uses:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Sorry for the breakage. I think we need to handle INT_LIST in the same way
as INSN_LIST though, and eliminate in XEXP (x, 1).
How about the attached? Testing in progress...
Works for me as well.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
REG_BR_PROB notes are stored as:
(expr_list:REG_BR_PROB (const_int prob) chain)
but a full const_int rtx seems a bit heavweight when all we want is
a plain int. This patch uses:
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB
REG_BR_PROB notes are stored as:
(expr_list:REG_BR_PROB (const_int prob) chain)
but a full const_int rtx seems a bit heavweight when all we want is
a plain int. This patch uses:
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB prob chain)
instead.
I didn't bother adding INT_LIST to lists.c because in practice we
Hello Richard,
Not directly related to your patch but...
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
@@ -588,14 +589,17 @@ cond_exec_process_if_block (ce_if_block_
goto fail;
#endif
- true_prob_val = find_reg_note (BB_END (test_bb), REG_BR_PROB, NULL_RTX);
- if
Hello Richard,
Not directly related to your patch but...
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
@@ -588,14 +589,17 @@ cond_exec_process_if_block (ce_if_block_
goto fail;
#endif
- true_prob_val = find_reg_note (BB_END (test_bb), REG_BR_PROB, NULL_RTX);
10 matches
Mail list logo