> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes:
Tom> Unless you have other tests to suggest, I am going to say that it has
Tom> been sufficiently tested and check it in on Friday.
Jakub said on irc that he thought I had done sufficient testing.
So, I am checking this patch in now.
thanks,
Tom
> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek writes:
Jakub> Well, even bad debugging experience problems would be very undesirable
Jakub> if we generated wrong debug info and everybody compiled it into their
Jakub> sources. But pretty-printers stay on the side, it is just a matter of
Jakub> updating the pytho
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:29:12AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> We're technically in regression-fixes-only mode. We give target/language
> maintainers some extra freedom though - while C++/libstdc++ are considered
> release critical and thus should not regress at this point I'm less sure
> abo
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This patch fixes some pretty-printer bugs pointed out in PR 51649.
>
> The bug in the PR is that the pretty-printers don't work if you build
> with --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.
>
> This patch adds test cases for all the changes I ma
This patch fixes some pretty-printer bugs pointed out in PR 51649.
The bug in the PR is that the pretty-printers don't work if you build
with --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.
This patch adds test cases for all the changes I made.
I derived most of the information here from reading c++co
