Thanks for the hint Vladimir, I'll pass some validation on arm.c and
arm.md/aarch64.md separately.
On 14 January 2014 20:09, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 01:41 PM, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>> A quick grep of the arm backend shows 11 instances of reload_in_progress:
>>>
>>> arm.c: && !(re
On 01/14/2014 01:41 PM, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> A quick grep of the arm backend shows 11 instances of reload_in_progress:
>>
>> arm.c: && !(reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
>> arm.c: if (! (reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
>> arm.c: if (! (reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
>>
> A quick grep of the arm backend shows 11 instances of reload_in_progress:
>
> arm.c: && !(reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
> arm.c: if (! (reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
> arm.c: if (! (reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
> arm.c: if (! (reload_in_progress || reload_co
On 14/01/14 16:48, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch fixes
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59787
>
> The problem of LRA looping was in that address with soft frame pointer
> was rejected as valid constraint in iwmmxt_amd_movdi insn.
>
> Ok to commit?
>
> 2014-01-
On 14/01/14 16:48, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch fixes
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59787
>
> The problem of LRA looping was in that address with soft frame pointer
> was rejected as valid constraint in iwmmxt_amd_movdi insn.
>
> Ok to commit?
>
> 2014-01-
Hi Vladimir,
I have test your patch with the following configurations, , and it
indeed eliminates the ICE.
--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
--with-arch=armv7-a
--with-fpu=vfpv3-d16
--with-float=softfp
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Renlin Li
On 14/01/14 16:48, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The fol
The following patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59787
The problem of LRA looping was in that address with soft frame pointer
was rejected as valid constraint in iwmmxt_amd_movdi insn.
Ok to commit?
2014-01-14 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/59787
* confi
