On 06/05/2018 12:56 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 05/19/2018 07:07 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> A comment earlier in in nonzero_address says, "Important case of WEAK
>>> we want to do well are comdats. Those are handled by later check for
>>>
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/19/2018 07:07 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> A comment earlier in in nonzero_address says, "Important case of WEAK
>> we want to do well are comdats. Those are handled by later check for
>> definition." But in this case we aren't handling
On 05/19/2018 07:07 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> A comment earlier in in nonzero_address says, "Important case of WEAK
> we want to do well are comdats. Those are handled by later check for
> definition." But in this case we aren't handling this comdat function
> well, we return false because it is
A comment earlier in in nonzero_address says, "Important case of WEAK
we want to do well are comdats. Those are handled by later check for
definition." But in this case we aren't handling this comdat function
well, we return false because it is DECL_WEAK and DECL_EXTERNAL
(because we aren't at
