On 12/10/11 01:48, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> Any objections to this version of the patch ?
>
> Fine with me though I think it's worthwhile to have such comments
> without -dA but that's my personal impression. I don't care either
> way.
>
> cheers
> Ramana
>
Why not define an enum in arm.
> Any objections to this version of the patch ?
Fine with me though I think it's worthwhile to have such comments
without -dA but that's my personal impression. I don't care either
way.
cheers
Ramana
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
> 2011-10-05 Nick Clifton
>
> * config/arm/arm.c
Hi Richard, Hi Paul, Hi Ramana,
Well my idea to have a header file containing all of the possible
binary file attributes does not seem to have taken off, so here is a
much simpler patch for the GCC ARM backend. It just adds comments to
the .eabi_directives (when -dA or -fverbose-asm are i
