On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
index
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
index 81c4ee6..04a0bc4 100644
--- gcc/match.pd
+++ gcc/match.pd
@@ -262,6 +262,16 @@ along
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Rasmus Villemoes r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
wrote:
[My first attempt at submitting a patch for gcc, so please forgive me
if I'm not following the right protocol.]
There are a few things
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
index 81c4ee6..04a0bc4 100644
--- gcc/match.pd
+++ gcc/match.pd
@@ -262,6 +262,16 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rasmus Villemoes r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14 2015, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Rasmus Villemoes
On Wed, Jan 14 2015, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Rasmus Villemoes r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
wrote:
[My first attempt at submitting a patch for gcc, so please forgive
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
index 81c4ee6..04a0bc4 100644
--- gcc/match.pd
+++ gcc/match.pd
@@ -262,6 +262,16 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
(abs tree_expr_nonnegative_p@0)
@0)
+/* x + (x 1) - (x + 1) ~1 */
[My first attempt at submitting a patch for gcc, so please forgive me
if I'm not following the right protocol.]
Sometimes rounding a variable to the next even integer is written x += x
1. This usually means using an extra register (and hence at least an
extra mov instruction) compared to the
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Rasmus Villemoes r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
wrote:
[My first attempt at submitting a patch for gcc, so please forgive me
if I'm not following the right protocol.]
There are a few things missing. For one, a testcase or two for the
added optimizations.
Sometimes
