Hi,
On 11/10/19 18:25, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/10/19 2:33 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/10/19 19:57, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/10/19 1:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:12:02PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
while working on cp_build_binary_op I noticed that the
On 10/10/19 2:33 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/10/19 19:57, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/10/19 1:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:12:02PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
while working on cp_build_binary_op I noticed that the testsuite wasn't
exercising the warnings in
Hi,
On 10/10/19 19:57, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/10/19 1:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:12:02PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
while working on cp_build_binary_op I noticed that the testsuite wasn't
exercising the warnings in case RROTATE_EXPR / LROTATE_EXPR, even
more
On 10/10/19 1:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:12:02PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
while working on cp_build_binary_op I noticed that the testsuite wasn't
exercising the warnings in case RROTATE_EXPR / LROTATE_EXPR, even more the
code handling those tree codes seemed
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:12:02PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> while working on cp_build_binary_op I noticed that the testsuite wasn't
> exercising the warnings in case RROTATE_EXPR / LROTATE_EXPR, even more the
> code handling those tree codes seemed completely unused. Turned out that the
> C
On 10/10/19 12:12 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
while working on cp_build_binary_op I noticed that the testsuite wasn't
exercising the warnings in case RROTATE_EXPR / LROTATE_EXPR, even more
the code handling those tree codes seemed completely unused. Turned out
that the C front-end doesn't
