Committed on gcc-5-branch as rev. 233379.
2016-02-12 0:04 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Fanfarillo :
> Dear all,
>
> in attachment the EVENT patch for gcc-5-branch directly back-ported
> from the trunk.
>
> Built and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I plan to commit this
> patch
Dear all,
in attachment the EVENT patch for gcc-5-branch directly back-ported
from the trunk.
Built and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I plan to commit this
patch this evening (Feb 12th, CET).
Cheers,
Alessandro
2015-12-17 17:19 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Fanfarillo :
>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:22:06PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
>
> I've noticed that this patch has been applied only on trunk and not on
> the gcc-5-branch. Is it a problem to include EVENTS in gcc-5?
>
No problem. When I applied the EVENTS patch to trunk,
the 5.3 release was being
Great! Thanks.
2015-12-17 15:57 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl :
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:22:06PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed that this patch has been applied only on trunk and not on
>> the gcc-5-branch. Is it a problem to include EVENTS
Hi,
I've noticed that this patch has been applied only on trunk and not on
the gcc-5-branch. Is it a problem to include EVENTS in gcc-5?
2015-12-02 23:00 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl :
> Committed as revision 231208.
>
> Alessandro, Tobias, is this a candidate for a
Yes please.
Thanks.
2015-12-02 23:00 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl :
> Committed as revision 231208.
>
> Alessandro, Tobias, is this a candidate for a commit to
> the 5-branch when it is re-opened?
>
> --
> steve
>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Alessandro
Committed as revision 231208.
Alessandro, Tobias, is this a candidate for a commit to
the 5-branch when it is re-opened?
--
steve
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
> *PING*
>
> 2015-11-26 17:51 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl :
>
*PING*
2015-11-26 17:51 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl :
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> in attachment the previous patch compatible with the current trunk.
>> The patch also includes the changes introduced in
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> in attachment the previous patch compatible with the current trunk.
> The patch also includes the changes introduced in the latest TS 18508.
>
> Built and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> PS: I will add
Hi all,
in attachment the patch for tests and missing functions in
libcaf_single (needed by the test suite).
Built and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
2015-11-26 17:51 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl :
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo
Dear all,
in attachment the previous patch compatible with the current trunk.
The patch also includes the changes introduced in the latest TS 18508.
Built and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
PS: I will add the test cases in a different patch.
2015-04-29 9:55 GMT+02:00 Tobias Burnus
Paul
I've bootstrap and regression tested the patch on x86_64-*-freebsd.
I intend to do the same tonight on i386-*-freebsd. After that, I'll
go over the patch as you have done and then intend to commit it.
AFAICT, Tobias is busy with Real-Life (tm) (or taking a much
needed rest from gfortran
Dear Alessandro and Tobias,
I have been through the patch to check for obvious bloopers but can
find none, as expected given the author :-)
I would dearly like to see the testcases at the same time as the patch
but I think that the commit should be made sooner, rather than
later. Given its
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Alessandro Fanfarillo
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> in attachment the previous patch compatible with the current trunk.
> The patch also includes the changes introduced in the latest TS 18508.
>
> Built and regtested on
14 matches
Mail list logo