On 20 May 2014 18:37, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi James
Thank you for pointing this out. In the new patch I removed the
modification of vqdmulh_n_s32 and vqdmulhq_n_s32.
Passed dejagnu testing on aarch64 qemu again. OK for trunk, 4.9 and 4.8?
2014-05-20 Guozhi Wei
On 21 May 2014 09:28, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2014 18:37, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi James
Thank you for pointing this out. In the new patch I removed the
modification of vqdmulh_n_s32 and vqdmulhq_n_s32.
Passed dejagnu testing on aarch64
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 21 May 2014 09:28, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2014 18:37, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi James
Thank you for pointing this out. In the new patch I removed the
modification of vqdmulh_n_s32 and
Committed to trunk, 4.9, and waiting for the release of 4.8.3.
OK for google/main and google/4.9?
thanks
Carrot
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 21 May 2014 09:28, Marcus Shawcroft
Since it is in trunk and gcc-4_9-branch, there is no need to put into
google branches -- will get it automatically after next merge.
David
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Committed to trunk, 4.9, and waiting for the release of 4.8.3.
OK for google/main and
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:18:40AM +0100, Carrot Wei wrote:
Hi
Hi,
The last operand of instruction sqdmulh can only be low fp registers,
so we should use constraint x. But the intrinsic functions use w.
This patch fixed the constrains in these intrinsics.
This restriction is only on the
Hi James
Thank you for pointing this out. In the new patch I removed the
modification of vqdmulh_n_s32 and vqdmulhq_n_s32.
Passed dejagnu testing on aarch64 qemu again. OK for trunk, 4.9 and 4.8?
2014-05-20 Guozhi Wei car...@google.com
* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vqdmulh_n_s16):
