On Tuesday 12 July 2016 15:57:41 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 12/07/16 11:26, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> > Hi Kyrill,
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > On Friday 20 May 2016 14:22:48 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> On 17/05/16 11:14, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> >>> Ping?
> >>>
> >>> ***
On 12/07/16 11:26, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Hi Thomas,
On Friday 20 May 2016 14:22:48 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 17/05/16 11:14, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2015-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme
*
Hi Kyrill,
On Friday 20 May 2016 14:22:48 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 17/05/16 11:14, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
> >
> > 2015-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme
> >
> > * config/arm/arm.c
On Friday 20 May 2016 14:22:48 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
> Hmm, I'm not a fan of this change. arm_print_operand_punct_valid_p is an
> implementation of a target hook that is used to validate user-provided
> inline asm as well and is therefore the right place to reject such invalid
Hi Thomas,
On 17/05/16 11:14, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2015-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_print_operand_punct_valid_p): Make %? valid
for Thumb-1.
* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_CBZ):
Ping?
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2015-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_print_operand_punct_valid_p): Make %? valid
for Thumb-1.
* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_CBZ): Define.
(TARGET_IDIV): Set for all Thumb targets