OK, provided that the patches in the above threads apply without conflicts.
If there are conflicts, please repost for review.
Comitted to 4.7 branch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-08/msg00360.html
Thanks, K
Hi!
There were only trivial merge conflicts like
[(match_operand 0 memory_operand )
(match_operand 1 memory_operand )]
---
[(match_operand 0 memory_operand)
(match_operand 1 memory_operand)]
!TARGET_HAS_BIONIC
Patch attached.
All necessary testing passed. Ok for 4.7?
Hi all!
I'd like to ask whether stack-protector changes for Android could go to 4.7?
Pathes are:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01089.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01157.html
Thanks,
Igor
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to ask whether stack-protector changes for Android could go to 4.7?
Pathes are:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01089.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01157.html
OK, as far as
On 8/08/2012, at 9:46 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to ask whether stack-protector changes for Android could go to 4.7?
Pathes are:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01089.html
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
2012-07-23 Sergey Melnikov sergey.melni...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.md (stack_protect_set): Disable the pattern
for Android since Android libc (bionic) does not provide random
value for
On 24/07/2012, at 10:08 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
2012-07-23 Sergey Melnikov sergey.melni...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.md (stack_protect_set): Disable the pattern
for Android since Android libc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure if that's related, but for x86_64-w64-mingw32 bootstrap fails in
stage 1:
gcc -c -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
- -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat
-
Hi,
I would kindly ask to revert this patch soonish. The define
OPTION_BIONIC is defined within linux.h header, which isn't used by
cygwin and mingw targets. so this symbol is undefined for them and
this is causing bootstrap issue for cygwin and mingw targets.
Regards,
Kai
Reverted.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-07/msg00442.html
Thanks, K
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would kindly ask to revert this patch soonish. The define
OPTION_BIONIC is defined within linux.h header, which isn't used by
cygwin and
On 10/07/2012, at 8:51 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
Let's try with this patch then. Is it ok for trunk after all
appropriate testing is done?
Sorry for the late reply, I've been down with a virus last week.
Uros,
Would you please approve this patch for i386 provided my review below?
Right, flag_android looks better, thanks.
Probably it's even better to check also bionic (OPTION_BIONIC)
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
For runtime stack protector enabling
12 matches
Mail list logo
