On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Is it ok to backport the patch to gcc-5-branch?
>
> A minor attribute fix is needed, please update type attribute of
> *vec_concatv2df for added alternatives, also for mainline.
Fixed in mainline with the following patch:
2015-08-06 Uros Bi
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it ok to backport the patch to gcc-5-branch?
A minor attribute fix is needed, please update type attribute of
*vec_concatv2df for added alternatives, also for mainline.
Otherwise, the patch looks safe, so OK for backport after
Hello,
Is it ok to backport the patch to gcc-5-branch?
--
Thanks, K
> On 04 Aug 15:31, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>
> commit 1055739cb51648794a01afd85f59efadd14378ed
> Author: Kirill Yukhin
> Date: Mon Aug 3 15:21:06 2015 +0300
>
> Fix vec_concatv2df and vec_dupv2df to block wrongly enabled A
On 04 Aug 15:31, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> On 04 Aug 14:10, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > - (set_attr "prefix_data16" "*,*,*,1,*,*,*,*")
> > > - (set_attr "prefix" "orig,vex,maybe_vex,orig,vex,maybe_vex,orig,orig")
> > > - (s
On 04 Aug 14:10, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > - (set_attr "prefix_data16" "*,*,*,1,*,*,*,*")
> > - (set_attr "prefix" "orig,vex,maybe_vex,orig,vex,maybe_vex,orig,orig")
> > - (set_attr "mode" "V2DF,V2DF,DF,V1DF,V1DF,DF,V4SF,V2SF")])
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For vec_dup and vec_concat patterns (of v2df mode) second operand
> is of scalar mode, so `ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok’ didn’t block EVEX registers,
> of non-512b modes (when AVX-512VL is turned off).
> This turns into 128/256b xmm[>15]
