On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:48:04AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> >
> > On 24/09/16 06:46, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>As reported in PR 61367, the aarch64 back-end is too
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
> On 24/09/16 06:46, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>As reported in PR 61367, the aarch64 back-end is too verbose when it
>> is dealing with the cost model. I tend to agree, no other back-end
Hi Andrew,
On 24/09/16 06:46, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Hi,
As reported in PR 61367, the aarch64 back-end is too verbose when it
is dealing with the cost model. I tend to agree, no other back-end is
this verbose. So I decided to add an option to enable this verbose
output if requested.
I did
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
> As reported in PR 61367, the aarch64 back-end is too verbose when it
> is dealing with the cost model. I tend to agree, no other back-end is
> this verbose. So I decided to add an option to enable this verbose
>