On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:24:20AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 06/07/15 11:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > Please make sure in a follow-up patch that the costing logic in
> > aarch64_rtx_costs also gets updated.
> >
>
> Tested with aarch64-none-linux-gnu cross compiler.
> is this OK?
T
On 16/07/15 10:24, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 06/07/15 11:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Please make sure in a follow-up patch that the costing logic in
aarch64_rtx_costs also gets updated.
Tested with aarch64-none-linux-gnu cross compiler.
is this OK?
i assume i should backport the fnmul fixes t
On 06/07/15 11:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Please make sure in a follow-up patch that the costing logic in
> aarch64_rtx_costs also gets updated.
>
Tested with aarch64-none-linux-gnu cross compiler.
is this OK?
i assume i should backport the fnmul fixes to the gcc-5 branch.
2015-07-16 Sza
On 15/07/15 09:11, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 09/07/15 15:40, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> On 06/07/15 16:39, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>>> On 6 July 2015 at 09:20, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>>
2015-07-06 Szabolcs Nagy
>
>
> PR target/66731 in Changelog ?
>
thanks, fixed in r225810.
On 09/07/15 15:40, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 06/07/15 16:39, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>> On 6 July 2015 at 09:20, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-07-06 Szabolcs Nagy
PR target/66731 in Changelog ?
Ramana
>>>
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-1.c: New.
>>> * gcc.target/aarch6
On 06/07/15 16:39, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 09:20, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>
>> 2015-07-06 Szabolcs Nagy
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-1.c: New.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-2.c: New.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-3.c: New.
>> * gcc.target/aa
On 6 July 2015 at 09:20, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> 2015-07-06 Szabolcs Nagy
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-1.c: New.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-2.c: New.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-3.c: New.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/fnmul-4.c: New.
+float
+foo_s (float a, float
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> fnmul was modeled as (-a)*b instead of -(a*b), which is wrong with
> -frounding-math, so the correct pattern is added too and the other
> one is only used if !flag_rounding_math.
>
> This affects a glibc math test, similar fix will b
