On Sep 4, 2012, at 22:42 , Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com wrote:
Please, no inlining. Think of stack back-traces and their use
when debugging.
But, there was a talk at the GNU Tools
Cauldron with related contents -
On 4 September 2012 21:42, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This adds a new optimization level, -Og, as previously discussed.
It aims at providing fast
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Matthew Gretton-Dann
matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org wrote:
Please, no inlining. Think of stack back-traces and their use
when debugging.
I would argue [without sufficient knowledge of how easy this would
actually be to do in a real compiler :-)] that this is
On 5 September 2012 09:55, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Matthew Gretton-Dann
matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org wrote:
Please, no inlining. Think of stack back-traces and their use
when debugging.
I would argue [without sufficient knowledge of
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
On 5 September 2012 09:55, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Matthew Gretton-Dann
matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org wrote:
Please, no inlining. Think of stack back-traces and their use
when
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:07:17AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
But that's not a problem with inlining, that's a problem with allowing
things to happen out of order (for some definition of things and
order) - which in my understanding -Og is going to tie down.
Yes, the goal is
On Sep 5, 2012, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Yes, the goal is definitely to avoid the jumping back and forth
on source lines you can see when debugging optimized programs.
Hmm... If that's the goal, how about adding to the mix the Statement
Frontier Notes proposal I advanced in
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM, rguent...@suse.de wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
wrote:
On 04/09/12 10:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM, rguent...@suse.de wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM,
On 4 September 2012 10:45, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM, rguent...@suse.de wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matthew Gretton-Dann
matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 September 2012 10:45, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM, rguent...@suse.de wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This adds a new optimization level, -Og, as previously discussed.
It aims at providing fast compilation, a superior debugging
experience and reasonable runtime performance. Instead of making
-O1 this optimization
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
Comments welcome,
No comments? Then I'll drop this idea for 4.8.
FWIW I liked the idea. But I'm not really competent to review the
implementation.
On x86 I would enable frame pointers. Even though gdb doesn't need
them, some other
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Comments welcome,
No comments? Then I'll drop this idea for 4.8.
Hey, don't discard my face2face comments :) Regarding -Og it's about
time, I like it, and your implementation is a start. The pass list (e.g.
if to include LIM or not, or
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This adds a new optimization level, -Og, as previously discussed.
It aims at providing fast compilation, a superior debugging
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
wrote:
This adds a new optimization level, -Og, as previously discussed.
It aims at providing fast
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM, rguent...@suse.de wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
wrote:
This adds a new optimization level, -Og,
17 matches
Mail list logo
