Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c (initializer_zerop): A constructor with no elements
does not zero initialize.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Ok for trunk and branches.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Ok for trunk and branches.
Err - please fix
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:20:16AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c (initializer_zerop): A
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:20:16AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:20:16AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:46:23AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
--- tree.c (revision 217190)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -10330,6 +10330,8 @@ initializer_zerop (const_tree init)
{
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT idx;
+if (TREE_CLOBBER_P (init))
+
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:46:23AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
--- tree.c (revision 217190)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -10330,6 +10330,8 @@ initializer_zerop (const_tree init)
{
unsigned
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
And for release branches I'd really prefer tree-ssa-strlen.c change.
Ok, I started testing the initializer_zerop change on the 4_9 branch,
will
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
And for release branches I'd really prefer tree-ssa-strlen.c change.
Ok, I
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:51:05PM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
And for
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:33:07PM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Supposedly the printfs should have been removed and the #include cstdio
isn't needed then either. No need to clutter the test output and log files.
On the other side, tests should abort (); or __builtin_abort (); on failure,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:33:07PM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Supposedly the printfs should have been removed and the #include cstdio
isn't needed then either. No need to clutter the test output and log
files.
On
missing test case?
David
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
This patch fixes an issue where tree-strlen was incorrectly removing a
store of 0 into a string because it thought a prior CLOBBER (which is
an empty constructor with no elements) was
Added testcase. Here is the new patch:
2014-11-12tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c (initializer_zerop): A constructor with no elements
does not zero initialize.
gcc/testsuite:
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr63841.C: New test.
Index: tree.c
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Added testcase. Here is the new patch:
2014-11-12tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c (initializer_zerop): A constructor with no elements
does not zero
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Added testcase. Here is the new patch:
2014-11-12tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Added testcase. Here is the new patch:
2014-11-12
19 matches
Mail list logo
