On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:51:23AM -0600, James Norris wrote:
> --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
> @@ -6683,6 +6683,14 @@ finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, bool allow_fields,
> bool declare_simd)
> error ("%qD appears both in data and map clauses", t);
>
Hi,
Ping!
Thanks,
Jim
On 02/02/2016 08:51 AM, James Norris wrote:
Hi!
On 02/01/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:41:50PM -0600, James Norris wrote:
The attached patch resolves c/PR64748. The patch
adds the use of parm's with the deviceptr clause.
[snip
Hi!
On 02/01/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:41:50PM -0600, James Norris wrote:
The attached patch resolves c/PR64748. The patch
adds the use of parm's with the deviceptr clause.
[snip snip]
--- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
@@ -10760,7 +10760,7
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:41:50PM -0600, James Norris wrote:
> The attached patch resolves c/PR64748. The patch
> adds the use of parm's with the deviceptr clause.
>
> Question
>
> As there is VAR_P (), could there be a PARM_P ()?
Not for GCC 6.x, for 7 it is possible.
> ---
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Jeff!
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:48:34 -0600, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/15 07:36, James Norris wrote:
Ping.
Note that the GCC trunk is in regression bugfix stage, so this patch may
(is likely?) be deferred
Hi Jim!
Sorry for the delay. Please be a little more descriptive in submissions:
for example, if you had used »OpenACC deviceptr clause« instead of
»deviceptr clause«, my mail client's search/filter would have pointed me
to this email earlier, or, by using a more descriptive subject line:
Hi Jeff!
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:48:34 -0600, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/15 07:36, James Norris wrote:
Ping.
Note that the GCC trunk is in regression bugfix stage, so this patch may
(is likely?) be deferred until the next stage1 development cycle.
The decision is with you
Hi!
Ping.
Thanks!
On 02/16/2015 12:26 PM, James Norris wrote:
This fixes the validation of the argument to the deviceptr clause.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK to commit to trunk?
Jim
On 03/10/15 07:36, James Norris wrote:
Hi!
Ping.
Note that the GCC trunk is in regression bugfix stage, so this patch may
(is likely?) be deferred until the next stage1 development cycle.
jeff
