Hi Mark,
OK for master. If you want to backport, that's fine by me but please give
it a few weeks.
Thanks for fixing this.
Paul
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 08:17, Mark Eggleston
wrote:
> **ping**
>
> previously omitted commit message added
>
> On 29/09/2020 14:03, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> > For
**ping**
previously omitted commit message added
On 29/09/2020 14:03, Mark Eggleston wrote:
For review.
When the first attempt was committed the result was PR97224 i.e. it
broke the build of SPECCPU 2006 Games.
I've changed the condition under which the error is produced. It was
produced
Hi Mark,
I haven't yet committed this.
I am unfamiliar with Andre, I've checked MAINTAINERS and I find Andre in
the "Write after approval" section.
Is Andre's approval sufficient? If so MAINTAINERS needs to be updated.
The official list of people who can review is at
I haven't yet committed this.
I am unfamiliar with Andre, I've checked MAINTAINERS and I find Andre in
the "Write after approval" section.
Is Andre's approval sufficient? If so MAINTAINERS needs to be updated.
If not: OK to commit and backport?
regards,
Mark
On 14/09/2020 09:03, Andre
Hi Marc,
the patch looks reasonable and ok to me. Ok for trunk.
Thanks for the patch.
Regards,
Andre
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 08:35:59 +0100
Mark Eggleston wrote:
> Please find attached a fix for PR95614. The original patch was by Steve
> Kargl.
>
> The original patch resulted in name
**ping**
On 04/09/2020 08:35, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Please find attached a fix for PR95614. The original patch was by
Steve Kargl.
The original patch resulted in name clashes between global identifiers
naming common blocks and local identifiers. According to the 2018
standard 19.3.1
