Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420]

2024-01-19 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
.@rivai.ai Date: 2024-01-19 15:53 To: Li Xu; gcc-patches CC: kito.cheng; palmer; zhengyu; pan2.li; Li Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420] Could you add a test for vle with mask? For example: __riscv_vle8 which overload __riscv_vle8_v_i8mf8_m and __riscv

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420]

2024-01-19 Thread Li Xu
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; zhengyu; pan2.li; Li Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420] Could you add a test for vle with mask? For example: __riscv_vle8 which overload __riscv_vle8_v_i8mf8_m and __riscv_vle8_v_u8mf8_m You are using pointer type and mask type

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Bugfix for resolve_overloaded_builtin[PR113420]

2024-01-18 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Could you add a test for vle with mask? For example: __riscv_vle8 which overload __riscv_vle8_v_i8mf8_m and __riscv_vle8_v_u8mf8_m You are using pointer type and mask type to resolve it. So this pointer type is expecting const int8_t or const uint8_t. Could you add test: 1.__riscv_vle8 (const