; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> In tree-vect-stmts.cc
>
> vect_check_scalar_mask
>
> Failed here:
>
> /* If the caller is not prepared for adjusting an externa
om: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-10-12 19:14
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> In tree-vect-stmts.cc
>
> vect_check_scalar_m
l_def, but some history
> might reveal the cases we put this code in for (we should be able to
> materialize all constants?). At least uniform boolean constants
> should be fine.
> >
> >
> >
> > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> >
> > From: Richard Biener
&g
ases we put this code in for (we should be able to
> materialize all constants?). At least uniform boolean constants
> should be fine.
> >
> >
> >
> > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> >
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Date: 2023-10-12 17:44
> &g
ssert FAILed.
>== shift_vec_info_type)
> && j == 1);
> continue;
> }
>
> Could you help me with that?
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Richard Biener
> Date: 2023-10-12
t; ?
But I don't know how to adjust that.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-10-12 17:55
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, juzhe.zh...@ri
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-10-12 17:55
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> I tree-vect-slp.cc:
> vect_get_and_check_slp_defs
> 711:
> Build SLP failed: invalid type of def
I think this can be restricted to vect_external_def, but some history
might reveal the cases we put this code in for (we should be able to
materialize all constants?). At least uniform boolean constants
should be fine.
>
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@
e cases we put this code in for (we should be able to
materialize all constants?). At least uniform boolean constants
should be fine.
>
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Richard Biener
> Date: 2023-10-12 17:44
> To: ???
> CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
>
n SLP failed:
Build SLP failed: invalid type of def
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-10-12 17:44
To: 钟居哲
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, ??? wrote:
> Thanks Richi point
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Richard Biener
> Date: 2023-10-11 20:50
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
>
> > This patch f
AD can resue the MASK_GATHER_LOAD SLP flow
naturally.
Is it reasonable ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-10-11 20:50
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Enhance SLP of MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD[PR111721]
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> This patch fixes this following FAILs in RISC-V regression:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-gather-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump
> vect "Loop contains only SLP stmts"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-gather-1.c scan-tree-dump vect "Loop contains only
13 matches
Mail list logo
