Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add +lse128 architectural extension command-line flag

2024-03-27 Thread Victor Do Nascimento
On 3/26/24 12:26, Richard Sandiford wrote: Victor Do Nascimento writes: Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the `+lse128' target

Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add +lse128 architectural extension command-line flag

2024-03-26 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Mär 15 2024, Victor Do Nascimento wrote: > \ No newline at end of file Please fix that. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."

Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add +lse128 architectural extension command-line flag

2024-03-26 Thread Richard Sandiford
Victor Do Nascimento writes: > Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions > by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of > Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the > `+lse128' target architecture compile-time flag is absent

Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Add +lse128 architectural extension command-line flag

2024-03-15 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 12:15, Victor Do Nascimento wrote: > > Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions > by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of > Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the > `+lse128' target architecture