Re: [PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr [PR114393]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 3/27/24 10:01, Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > > > > The below testcases use a lambda-expr as a template argument and they > > > > all trip over the below

Re: [PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr [PR114393]

On 3/27/24 10:01, Patrick Palka wrote: On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: The below testcases use a lambda-expr as a template argument and they all trip over the below added tsubst_lambda_expr sanity check ultimately because

Re: [PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr [PR114393]

On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > > > for trunk? > > > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > > > The below testcases use a

Re: [PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr [PR114393]

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > > for trunk? > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > The below testcases use a lambda-expr as a template argument and they > > all trip over the

Re: [PATCH] c++: templated substitution into lambda-expr [PR114393]

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > for trunk? > > -- >8 -- > > The below testcases use a lambda-expr as a template argument and they > all trip over the below added tsubst_lambda_expr sanity check ultimately >