On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 01:06, Will Hawkins wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay. Tested on x86-64 Linux.
>
> -->8--
>
> After consultation with Jonathan, it seemed like a good idea to create a
> single function that performed one-allocation string concatenation that
> could be used by various different
Just wanted to see if there was anything else I can do to help move
this over the finish line! Thanks for all the work that you all do!
Sincerely,
Will
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:06 PM Will Hawkins wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay. Tested on x86-64 Linux.
>
> -->8--
>
> After consultation with
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 18:51, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> On 05/09/22 20:30, Will Hawkins wrote:
> > Based on Jonathan's work, here is a patch for the implementation of
> > operator+
> > on std::string that makes sure we always use the best allocation strategy.
> >
> > I have
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:05 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, 18:51 François Dumont via Libstdc++,
> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/09/22 20:30, Will Hawkins wrote:
>> > Based on Jonathan's work, here is a patch for the implementation of
>> > operator+
>> > on std::string that makes
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, 18:51 François Dumont via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> On 05/09/22 20:30, Will Hawkins wrote:
> > Based on Jonathan's work, here is a patch for the implementation of
> operator+
> > on std::string that makes sure we always use the best allocation
> strategy.
>
On 05/09/22 20:30, Will Hawkins wrote:
Based on Jonathan's work, here is a patch for the implementation of operator+
on std::string that makes sure we always use the best allocation strategy.
I have attempted to learn from all the feedback that I got on a previous
submission -- I hope I did the
