On Sun, 3 Mar 2024, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 2/9/24 03:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The following allows a base term to be derived from an existing
> > MEM_EXPR, notably the points-to set of a MEM_REF base. For the
> > testcase in the PR this helps RTL DSE elide stores to a stack
> >
On 2/9/24 03:26, Richard Biener wrote:
The following allows a base term to be derived from an existing
MEM_EXPR, notably the points-to set of a MEM_REF base. For the
testcase in the PR this helps RTL DSE elide stores to a stack
temporary. This covers pointers to NONLOCAL which can be mapped
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 09:00, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:21 PM Toon Moene wrote:
> >
> > I managed to try this patch on aarch64-linux-gnu:
> >
> > This is the test run without your patch:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-February/807637.html
>
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:21 PM Toon Moene wrote:
>
> I managed to try this patch on aarch64-linux-gnu:
>
> This is the test run without your patch:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-February/807637.html
>
> And this is the "result" with your patch:
>
>
I managed to try this patch on aarch64-linux-gnu:
This is the test run without your patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-February/807637.html
And this is the "result" with your patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-February/807645.html
For me, as for
