On 5/21/21 6:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Yes, wrappers is a no-go. But you could just have added the features
you need to the generic code? Was there a technical reason not to do
that? It sounds useful in many places, not just here.
I agree it would be nice if all the gen* tools had
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:37:30AM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 21 May 2021 22:56:09 CEST, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >>> + char *buf = (char *) malloc (lastpos - pos + 2);
> >>> + memcpy (buf, [pos], lastpos - pos + 1);
> >>> + buf[lastpos - pos + 1] = '\0';
>
On 21 May 2021 22:56:09 CEST, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>>> + if (lastpos < pos)
>>> +return 0;
>>> +
>>> + char *buf = (char *) malloc (lastpos - pos + 2);
>>> + memcpy (buf, [pos], lastpos - pos + 1);
>>> + buf[lastpos - pos + 1] = '\0';
>>> +
>>> + pos = lastpos + 1;
>>> +
Hi!
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:56:09PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On 5/21/21 1:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>+/* Exit codes for the shell. */
> >>+enum exit_codes {
> >>+ EC_INTERR
> >>+};
> >Please define this with some specified value (so append " = 1" or such),
> >or just write
On 5/21/21 1:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:32:41AM -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
+/* Used as a sentinel for range constraints on integer fields. No field can
+ be 32 bits wide, so this is a safe sentinel value. */
+#define MININT INT32_MIN
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:32:41AM -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> +/* Used as a sentinel for range constraints on integer fields. No field can
> + be 32 bits wide, so this is a safe sentinel value. */
> +#define MININT INT32_MIN
INT32_MIN is for value of type int32_t. You
