app@gmail.com; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang
; kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switching: Add optional EMIT_AFTER hook
> Conceptually the rounding mode is just a property. The call, in
> effect, should demand a "normal" rounding mode and set the rounding
> Conceptually the rounding mode is just a property. The call, in
> effect, should demand a "normal" rounding mode and set the rounding
> mode to unknown if I understand how this is supposed to work. If my
> understanding is wrong, then maybe that's where we should start --
> with a good
On 8/23/23 22:53, Li, Pan2 wrote:
Thanks Jeff.
That implies a save/restore pair around the call (possibly optimized so
that we minimize the number of save/restores). I would have expected
x86 to already be doing this. But maybe there's some ABI thing around
mmx vs x86 state that allows it
On 8/25/23 06:44, Li, Pan2 wrote:
Hi Jeff,
You might also peek at the RTL gcse/pre code which is also LCM based and
has the same class of problems.
I found a similar approach to take care of this in gcse.cc/pre_edge_insert with
some comments as below.
/* We can't insert anything on
...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switching: Add optional EMIT_AFTER hook
Hi Jeff,
Kindly ping for the Patch V2 as below.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628508.html
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 8:45 PM
To: Li, Pan2
;
kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switching: Add optional EMIT_AFTER hook
Hi Jeff,
> You might also peek at the RTL gcse/pre code which is also LCM based and
> has the same class of problems.
I found a similar approach to take care of this in gcse.cc/pre_edge_insert with
: Gcc-patches On Behalf
Of Li, Pan2 via Gcc-patches
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 12:54 PM
To: Jeff Law ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang ;
kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switching: Add optional EMIT_AFTER hook
Thanks Jeff.
> That implies a s
, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang ;
kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switching: Add optional EMIT_AFTER hook
On 8/23/23 08:54, Li, Pan2 wrote:
> Thanks Jeff for comments.
>
>> Understood. So the natural question is
On 8/23/23 08:54, Li, Pan2 wrote:
Thanks Jeff for comments.
Understood. So the natural question is why does x86/sh not need this
for its mode switching? Don't all the same issues exist on those
targets as well?
AFAIK, it comes from the different design principle between the risc-v and
try based on your suggestion soon as I am in the
middle of something.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 10:25 PM
To: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang ;
kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switc
On 8/23/23 00:03, Li, Pan2 wrote:
Thanks Jeff for comments, and sorry for late response.
The background comes from the CALL insn. For the RISC-V dynamic rounding mode
we need to
1. restore the frm BEFORE call, to avoid the static rounding mode pollute the
call.
2. Backup the frm AFTER
u.org
Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; Wang, Yanzhang ;
kito.ch...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Mode-Switching: Add optional EMIT_AFTER hook
On 8/21/23 01:26, pan2...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Pan Li
>
> We have EMIT hook in mode switching already, which will insert the
> insn before in mos
On 8/21/23 01:26, pan2...@intel.com wrote:
From: Pan Li
We have EMIT hook in mode switching already, which will insert the
insn before in most cases. However, in some arch like RISC-V, it
requires the additional insn to be inserted after when meet a call.
|
| <- EMIT HOOK,
13 matches
Mail list logo
