gt;> CC: Kito Cheng; gcc-patches; palmer; rdapp; juzhe.zhong
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] options: Define TARGET__P and
>> TARGET__OPTS_P macro for Mask and InverseMask
>> Thanks, committed, and just did one more check with x86 again, it
>> works as well, hope no more awk
PTS (opts);
>
>
>
> --
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> *From:* Kito Cheng
> *Date:* 2023-10-12 05:20
> *To:* Jeff Law
> *CC:* Kito Cheng ; gcc-patches
> ; palmer ; rdapp
> ; juzhe.zhong
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] options: Define TARGET__P and
> TARGET__OPTS_P m
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] options: Define TARGET__P and
TARGET__OPTS_P macro for Mask and InverseMask
Thanks, committed, and just did one more check with x86 again, it
works as well, hope no more awk portable issue this time :P
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:51 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
>
Thanks, committed, and just did one more check with x86 again, it
works as well, hope no more awk portable issue this time :P
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:51 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/9/23 22:13, Kito Cheng wrote:
> > We TARGET__P marcro to test a Mask and InverseMask with user
> > specified
On 10/9/23 22:13, Kito Cheng wrote:
We TARGET__P marcro to test a Mask and InverseMask with user
specified target_variable, however we may want to test with specific
gcc_options variable rather than target_variable.
Like RISC-V has defined lots of Mask with TargetVariable, which is not
easy t
