Matthias Klose via Gcc-patches writes:
> On 10.11.22 20:05, apinski--- via Binutils wrote:
>> From: Andrew Pinski
>> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
>> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building.
>> Before it was a recommended but not required
On 10.11.22 20:05, apinski--- via Binutils wrote:
From: Andrew Pinski
This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building.
Before it was a recommended but not required library.
Also this allows building of GMP and MPFR
>> I think it's fine to move forward with this now.
>> Thank you again for doing this.
Andrew> Just to double check this is an approval?
Yes, sorry for being unclear.
Tom
On 12/20/22 20:45, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:59 AM Tom Tromey wrote:
"Andrew" == apinski--- via Gdb-patches writes:
Andrew> From: Andrew Pinski
Andrew> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
Andrew> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:59 AM Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > "Andrew" == apinski--- via Gdb-patches
> > writes:
>
> Andrew> From: Andrew Pinski
> Andrew> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
> Andrew> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building.
> "Andrew" == apinski--- via Gdb-patches
> writes:
Andrew> From: Andrew Pinski
Andrew> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
Andrew> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building.
Andrew> Before it was a recommended but not required library.
On 11/16/22 09:01, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Jeff" == Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes:
This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
gdb.
Jeff> If the GDB folks confirm they want this behavior, then the toplevel
Jeff> bits are fine.
I think we do, but my inclination is to wait
> "Jeff" == Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes:
>> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
>> gdb.
Jeff> If the GDB folks confirm they want this behavior, then the toplevel
Jeff> bits are fine.
I think we do, but my inclination is to wait until after GDB 13 branches.
On 11/10/22 12:05, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Andrew Pinski
This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for
gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building.
Before it was a recommended but not required library.
Also this allows building of GMP and
