On 30/06/14 19:17 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/06/14 00:18 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
Please put a space above this new function, otherwise it looks like
the Dummy implementations comment applies to this function, but in
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/06/14 00:18 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
Please put a space above this new function, otherwise it looks like
the Dummy implementations comment applies to this function, but in
fact that function is used for dfs mode.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Tim Shen timshe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm sure this is because I still don't understand all the regex code,
but doesn't this change mean that for an extended mode regex with
backrefs, the
On 28/06/14 00:18 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex_executor.h
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex_executor.h
index 1991c00..e02fa65 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex_executor.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex_executor.h
@@ -173,6 +173,8 @@
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.tcc
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.tcc
index a81f517..6a1faaf 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.tcc
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
// without defining a macro. Users
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm sure this is because I still don't understand all the regex code,
but doesn't this change mean that for an extended mode regex with
backrefs, the user could define _GLIBCXX_REGEX_USE_THOMPSON_NFA and
backrefs
